Talk:Aon (company)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Update to Aon descriptor in article
[edit]Hi there, I've adjusted the description of Aon as a "global professional services firm" in the article description and provided a source. If anyone has any further concerns, please feel free to contact me here or on my Talk page. Thank you Jane for Gregory C. Case (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
9/11
[edit]I don't see any reference to their employees killed on 9/11. Bearian (talk) 06:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 17 March 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Aon (company) be renamed and moved to Aon plc. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Aon (company) → Aon plc – WP:CONCISE "plc" is enough to distinguish it from other articles and no other companies with the name, "Aon," have their own articles. WiinterU 07:35, 11 March 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). C F A 21:37, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- This is is standard disambiguation rather than using legal suffixes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Actually both methods are acceptable per WP:NCCORP#Disambiguation, but I would agree that it should go through a full discussion to change the title from the "(company)" parenthetical disambiguation to the legal suffix. In similar previous RM discussions I have seen, it has frequently depended on whether the legal suffix is included in its WP:COMMONAME used by most reliable sources, and using "(company)" is instead generally preferred when reliable sources rarely use the legal suffix. Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Chicago articles
- Mid-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- C-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
- C-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- Requested moves